Tim Hoch Hero Banner
Justia Lawyer Rating for Timothy Hoch

Past Results

Note: The majority of the cases below were settled in the past 3 years. As new cases settle we will update to reflect our 20 latest cases. These results are not intended to be a comment on the type of case you may have. Each case is different and results vary widely depending on the facts of each case. I am happy to discuss your case on a confidential basis to see whether it is the type of case I can handle.

  1. Defective product: $1.8 million
    This case involved a defective medical product that caused permanent damage to my client, a young mom.
  2. Defective product: $1.1 million
    I represented the family of a man who was killed by a defective product.
  3. Professional negligence: $1.3 million
    I represented a woman who had a leg amputated due to professional negligence.
  4. Wrongful death caused by drunk driver: $470,000.00 ($220,000.00 over policy limits)
    I represented the family of a beautiful 46 year old wife and mother who was killed by a drunk driver. The perpetrator paid $220,000.00 above his policy limits to settle the case.
  5. Apartment complex insurance claim: $500,000.00
    I sued the property insurer after a legitimate claim was denied based on a “wear and tear” exclusion in a policy. We sued for breach of contract, bad faith and violations of the “Prompt Payment of Claims” statute.
  6. Warehouse insurance claim: $350,000.00
    I sued the property insurer after denial of a claim based on an alleged failure to cooperate clause in a policy (among other defenses). We sued for breach of contract, bad faith and violations of the “Prompt Payment of Claims” statute.
  7. Retail property insurance dispute: $400,000.00
    I sued my client’s property insurer who denied the claim by alleging that the damage was not the type covered under the Policy. We sued for breach of contract, bad faith and violations of the “Prompt Payment of Claims” statute.
  8. Apartment complex property insurance dispute: $310,000.00
    The property insurance company denied the claim alleging that the damage occurred outside the policy period. We sued for breach of contract, bad faith and violations of the “Prompt Payment of Claims” statute.
  9. Apartment complex property insurance dispute: $300,000.00
    The property insurance company alleged that the damage was not from a covered cause of loss. We sued for breach of contract, bad faith and violations of the “Prompt Payment of Claims” statute.
  10. Royalty underpayment litigation: $4,000,000.00
    I was co-counsel on a case brought by several hundred royalty owners against a major oil and gas producer.
  11. Apartment complex property insurance dispute: $225,000.00
    The insurance company denied the claim based on a co-insurance clause in a commercial insurance policy. We sued for breach of contract, bad faith and violations of the “Prompt Payment of Claims” statute.
  12. Apartment complex property insurance dispute: $150,000.00
    I sued the property insurer after a legitimate claim was denied based on a “wear and tear” exclusion in a policy. We sued for breach of contract, bad faith and violations of the “Prompt Payment of Claims” statute.
  13. Warehouse property insurance dispute: $150,000.00
    The property insurance company alleged that the damage was not from a covered cause of loss. We sued for breach of contract, bad faith and violations of the “Prompt Payment of Claims” statute.
  14. Residential property insurance dispute: $206,000.00
    The property insurance company alleged that the damage was not from a covered cause of loss. We sued for breach of contract, bad faith and violations of the “Prompt Payment of Claims” statute.
  15. Warehouse property insurance dispute: $107,000.00
    The property insurance company alleged that the damage was not from a covered cause of loss. We sued for breach of contract, bad faith and violations of the “Prompt Payment of Claims” statute.
  16. Convenience store property insurance dispute: $125,000.00
    The property insurance company alleged that the damage was not from a covered cause of loss. We sued for breach of contract, bad faith and violations of the “Prompt Payment of Claims” statute.
  17. Commercial Contract dispute: Confidential settlement amount.
    I represented a distributor against a manufacturer in a contract dispute. The case was in Federal Court and settled on the eve of trial.
  18. Wrongful foreclosure: $75,000.00
    I represented a property owner who was not properly credited with a payment which resulted in a foreclosure.
  19. Personal injury: $45,000.00
  20. Retail building commercial property dispute: $50,000.00.
    The property insurance company denied the claim alleging that the damage occurred outside the policy period. We sued for breach of contract, bad faith and violations of the “Prompt Payment of Claims” statute.
Client Reviews
★★★★★
Tim represented us in a dispute with our insurance company over roof damage due to a hail storm in the Dallas area. We were very disheartened by the constant denials and dishonest treatment we were receiving from the insurance carrier, and Tim counseled us to remain patient while he systematically put together expert opinions and facts that supported our claim. Eventually we were able to settle our case and had the roof replaced on our apartment building just two months before the big tornado hit in late 2015. Our investment property was the only one in the area that did not sustain any roof damage! We were lucky with our timing, but we were even more fortunate to have Tim on our side. We highly recommend Tim's firm! Allan and Marian Goodman
★★★★★
In short order, he was able to quickly understand and master the details of our case and map out a very cost-effective, efficient legal strategy. After a series of quick wins in court, our opponent came to the table with a highly satisfactory settlement. Mr. Hoch’s ability to effectively tell a persuasive story within the confines of a courtroom is without equal. Anthony Page
★★★★★
Tim’s knowledge and insight regarding not just the law, but business and human nature in general was greatly appreciated and relied upon as we navigated through a difficult situation. Tim has my utmost admiration and respect both on a personal and professional basis. Phillip A. Reinsch
★★★★★
We use Tim Hoch to handle complex business litigation matters on a variety of topics. He combines a strategic, no-frills approach with a bottom-line mindset. He is extremely responsive, organized and thorough. We would gladly recommend his services. Richard Warren, CEO